NEWS

'Law on the Protection of Personal Data No. 6698', which has been pending for many years in Turkish Law System and entered into force after being published on 7 April 2016, is intended to protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals, especially the privacy of private life in the processing of personal data and to regulate the obligations and rules to be complied with by real person and legal entity in processing personal data.

Competition Authority, on the grounds that it leads to unfair competition, had fine 93 million Turkish Liras to Google which is technology giant of the USA. After this penalty, Google, if the situation is not regulated, warned would not be given a new license in Turkey, in order to use their own programs.
Competition Authority, due to anti-competitive behavior, had fine of 93 million liras to Google. After that, Google has taken an embargo decision, which concerns millions of people.

Temsa, which was established in 1968 and has been operating in a manufacturing facility of 510 thousand square meters in Adana since 1987, made a statement regarding the decision to stop production and foreclosures. TEMSA, which stopped production for 2 weeks after the sale,made an official statement. According to the company description, "Ourcompany has had to stop its activities due to the fact that banks get processing their loans before maturity and foreclosures applied."

Nowadays, the diversification of disputes, the increase in the workload of the courts, the judicial process, the increasing costs of the proceedings, the expected benefit from confidentiality, the possibility of the parties to compromise between their own will have increased the need for mediation.

In the case of death of consumer, who uses a mortgage credit, the bank must inform the customer about the insurance of the credit debt in order to protect the wife/husband and the children of consumer. The bank must prove that the obligation to inform is fulfilled, otherwise ...

First Constitutional Court, after the Board of the Unification of Case Laws of the Supreme Court decided that; immaterial compensation in favor of the cheated spouse cannot be requested from the lover of the cheating spouse. ...